
Attachment theory and social media use may not be the first thing that comes to mind when first discovering your attachment style, yet there are some clear associations between insecure attachment and how we interact online–in both relationships and posting patterns.
Social media brings us together. Or does it?
Nearly five billion people around the world use social media; it has become an indispensable part of many of our lives. This should mean we feel less lonely than ever, right? But in reality, people are feeling increasingly cut off and isolated from others, and social media may be partly to blame.
In fact, social media use can have many harmful effects. It can damage our self-esteem, wreak havoc on our mental health, and make virtual interactions in relationships more comfortable than physical ones.
The impact of social media use on our relationship dynamics has been a hot topic among experts. But what about the effect of social media on attachment styles? And if there is a link between social media and attachment theory, what is it?
To answer all of your questions on social media use and attachment, this article will cover:
Let’s come right out and speak openly: There isn’t a lot of research on attachment theory and social media use (specifically how social media impacts our attachment style). Instead, studies tend to do a 180° and focus on how attachment styles predict social media use. We’ll get to this momentarily. For now, let’s explore the information that is available; the impact of social media on relationship dynamics.
Studies show that social media use can be detrimental to our relationships in more ways than one–let’s consider how.
Before we delve into the link between attachment theory and social media, we will discuss how, according to research, social media use can have five main negative effects on our relationships.
People with social anxiety may prefer online communication as a way to side-step the stress they feel when in the physical presence of others. However, this ability to choose can be detrimental.
When socially anxious individuals start to rely on online communication (and avoid in-person interactions as a result), this may increase the functional impairment they face in relationships.
For example, a 2021 study found that 59% of people with excessive social media habits reported negative effects on their social interactions, including their relationships with friends and family members. They also said that social media use had made in-person interactions more difficult.
While most would never dream of silently disappearing from someone’s life in person, these types of interactions (or lack thereof) are all too common on social media. This phenomenon is known as ghosting–whereby one person suddenly cuts off communication with another without any explanation. A related behavior is orbiting, where someone stops direct communication but continues to engage with your social media, similar to but distinct from breadcrumbing.
Research suggests that avoidant attachers are statistically more likely to ghost than they are to be ghosted, as they often prefer using “indirect” methods to end their relationships, such as distancing themselves, avoiding their partner, or withdrawing. Social media makes using indirect breakup methods far easier as it helps avoid person-to-person conflict, making it more common than in the past.
“Phubbing” is a term used to describe phone snubbing. Or, in other words, when people are more focused on their phones than what’s in front of them (usually, their partner). 17% of people report that they’re phubbed over four times a day, so it’s clearly a pretty common occurrence.
With the rise of social media and endless “doom scrolling,” phubbing is more common than ever. And as phubbing has been associated with relationship dissatisfaction, it’s likely that social media use is leading to less relationship satisfaction overall. A study from 2021 looking into the effect of social media on relationship satisfaction supports this notion; it found that the time a person spends on Instagram is associated with dissatisfaction in their relationship.
If a person’s time and attention are consistently directed toward their phone, not their partner, this can quickly cause ripples in a relationship. And when phubbing starts to affect relationship satisfaction, conflicts are more likely to arise.
Studies show that lower relationship satisfaction links to not only the frequency of conflicts but also how constructive our strategies to resolve conflicts are. For example, high relationship satisfaction is linked to positive conflict resolution strategies like agreeing, compromising, or using humor to diffuse the situation. In contrast, low relationship satisfaction is associated with conflict engagement, defensiveness, and withdrawal.
Social media has made infidelity easier than ever. Not only can a person communicate with anyone, anywhere in the world, but they can also hide it in a password-protected device.
However, it’s important to consider this link with a pinch of salt, as there is little research on the influence of social media on cheating behaviors. The studies that do show a link relate cheating behaviors to relationship concerns like low relationship satisfaction. Therefore, it’s possible that relationship difficulties trigger cheating behaviors, not social media.
While these five negative effects of social media may make us think otherwise, social media isn’t all bad. We can benefit from social media use if we do so in specific ways.
Although there are some clear negative associations between attachment theory and social media, there is also some weight to the idea that social media connects us. For example, when it’s our only form of contact with long-distance family members and friends, social media can be a great tool for staying in touch.
Social media also helps to connect like-minded people with similar interests via online communities. For example, Facebook has community pages, LinkedIn shows you people with similar backgrounds to you, and so on. These communities provide an opportunity to connect with people you’d never normally know about.
And if you use social media actively, research suggests that social media use can be more good than bad. Using social media actively may involve sharing important information with a select few people and only connecting with people you know.
Furthermore, social media can be an invaluable communication tool, particularly through sharing images or if you find it difficult to communicate verbally.
Attachment styles certainly can shape our in-person relationships. But can attachment theory and social media affect our interactions with people online? The evidence points to yes. Our attachment style influences how we use social media in three key ways.
According to research, both anxious and avoidant attachers often use social media to replace or compensate for what’s missing from their relationships in the physical world. However, they do so in different ways.
Anxious attachers may be more likely to initiate online relationships and tend to spend a long time online at night. They often turn to social media when experiencing negative feelings to seek comfort and reassurance.
Avoidant attachers, on the other hand, are likely to be more private on social media. They are less likely to post or update their status, and they rarely initiate social relationships. They also don’t receive as many friendship requests online.
While the two patterns of interaction differ between insecure attachment styles, the outcome can be the same: Studies show that both anxious and avoidant attachment are related to social media addiction, which can have various health consequences.
Furthermore, there’s another key problem with how insecure attachers use social media. For anxious attachers, social media can’t live up to their reassurance-seeking demands. And if they have a negative comment or response, this can affect their self-esteem. For avoidant attachers, keeping a distance from relationships may feel safe, but it side-steps an important basic human need: connection.
At this point, it may be useful to note that the characteristics of disorganized attachment vacillate between those of anxious and avoidant depending on the individual’s unique circumstances and moods.
Attachment theory and social media may also influence the nature of peoples’ social media relationships. For example, a meta-analysis found that people with abandonment anxiety often use platforms like social media to increase their feelings of belonging and to feel well-liked by others. As a result, they tend to seek out relationships more frequently. However, research indicates that, despite this frequency, they don’t feel close to their social media network.
In contrast, research shows that avoidant attachers typically interact more with celebrities than anyone else on social media. In essence, they choose social situations where forming an intimate connection is highly improbable.
Avoidant attachers also report that they get less social and emotional fulfillment out of their relationships on social media. Avoidant attachers often lack trust in others to meet their needs, which could mean they miss out on the benefits of social networks, such as emotional support, improved health, and instrumental help.
A person’s attachment style doesn’t just influence how they interact with others on social media–it also affects posting behaviors. Studies show that people who are more insecure about their partner’s feelings tend to make their relationship more visible to others. So, you guessed it, anxious attachers typically post more often than avoidant attachers.
Avoidant attachers appear to have a lower desire to make their relationships visible to others, instead keeping it to themselves or avoiding intimate relationships altogether.
Social media is supposed to bring us together. But when you combine social media overuse with an insecure attachment style, we often see negative effects on relationships.
Social media overuse can make socially anxious people feel more uncomfortable with in-person interactions and can make negative behavior patterns like ghosting, phubbing, and cheating all the more common. Excessive social media use may also lead to lower relationship satisfaction, which can cause more frequent and unhealthier relationship conflicts down the line.
But we’d be wrong if we assumed social media only affects our relationships and not the other way around. Studies repeatedly show that our attachment theory and social media use are linked: Our attachment styles can influence how we use social media. Whether it’s for reassurance-seeking or avoiding in-person relationships, unhealthy social media use can lead to social media dependence and addiction, as it may compensate for the difficulties of in-person relationships.
Bouffard, S., Giglio, D., & Zheng, Z. (2021). Social media and romantic relationship: Excessive social media use leads to relationship conflicts, negative outcomes, and addiction via mediated pathways. Social Science Computer Review, 40(6), 1523–1541.
Cramer, D. (2000). Relationship satisfaction and conflict style in romantic relationships. The Journal of Psychology, 134(3), 337–341.
D’Arienzo, M. C., Boursier, V., & Griffiths, M. D. (2019). Addiction to Social Media and Attachment Styles: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 17(4), 1094–1118.
Jarai, M. (2023, February 15). How does social media affect relationships? Medical News Today.
Kolhar, M., Kazi, R. N., & Alameen, A. (2021). Effect of social media use on learning, social interactions, and sleep duration among university students. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 28(4), 2216–2222.
Liu, C., & Ma, J. (2019). Adult attachment style, emotion regulation, and social networking sites addiction. Frontiers in Psychology, 10.
McDaniel, B. T., Drouin, M., & Cravens, J. D. (2017). Do You Have Anything to Hide? Infidelity-Related Behaviors on Social Media Sites and Marital Satisfaction. Computers in human behavior, 66, 88–95.
Moland, M. (2011). Conflict And Satisfaction In Romantic Relationships. Master’s Theses, 154.
Oldmeadow, J. A., Quinn, S., & Kowert, R. (2013). Attachment style, social skills, and Facebook use amongst adults. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 1142–1149.
Roberts, J. A., & David, M. E. (2023). On the outside looking in: Social media intensity, social connection, and user well-being: The moderating role of passive social media use. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 55(3), 240–252.
Roberts, J. A., & David, M. E. (2016). My life has become a major distraction from my cell phone: Partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction among romantic partners. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 134–141.
Statista. (2023, October 25). Internet and social media users in the world 2023.
Stöven, L. M., & Herzberg, P. Y. (2020). Relationship 2.0: A systematic review of associations between the use of social network sites and attachment style. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(3), 1103–1128.
United States Joint Economic Committee. (2018, August 22). All the Lonely Americans? All The Lonely Americans?